首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk of endometrial cancer in women treated with ovary-stimulating drugs for subfertility.
【2h】

Risk of endometrial cancer in women treated with ovary-stimulating drugs for subfertility.

机译:用卵巢刺激药治疗不孕症患者的子宫内膜癌风险。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment for subfertility principally involves the use of ovary-stimulating agents, including selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as clomiphene citrate, gonadotropins, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists, as well as human chorionic gonadotropin. Ovary-stimulating drugs may act directly or indirectly upon the endometrium (lining of the womb). Nulliparity and some causes of subfertility are recognized as risk factors for endometrial cancer. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between the use of ovary-stimulating drugs for the treatment of subfertility and the risk of endometrial cancer. SEARCH METHODS: A search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) databases up to July 2016, using a predefined search algorithm. A search in OpenGrey, ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov, ZETOC and reports of major conferences was also performed. We did not impose language and publication status restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Cohort and case-control studies reporting on the association between endometrial cancer and exposure to ovary-stimulating drugs for subfertility in adult women were deemed eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study characteristics and findings were extracted by review authors independently working in pairs. Inconsistency between studies was quantified by estimating I(2). Random-effects (RE) models were used to calculate pooled effect estimates. Separate analyses were performed, comparing treated subfertile women versus general population and/or unexposed subfertile women, to address the superimposition of subfertility as an independent risk factor for endometrial cancer. MAIN RESULTS: Nineteen studies were eligible for inclusion (1,937,880 participants). Overall, the quality of evidence was very low, due to serious risk of bias and indirectness (non-randomised studies (NRS), which was reflected on the GRADE assessment.Six eligible studies, including subfertile women, without a general population control group, found that exposure to any ovary-stimulating drug was not associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.37; 156,774 participants; very low quality evidence). Fifteen eligible studies, using a general population as the control group, found an increased risk after exposure to any ovary-stimulating drug (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.61; 1,762,829 participants; very low quality evidence).Five eligible studies, confined to subfertile women (92,849 participants), reported on exposure to clomiphene citrate; the pooled studies indicated a positive association ( RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.71; 88,618 participants; very low quality evidence), although only at high dosage (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.68; two studies; 12,073 participants) and at a high number of cycles (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.47; three studies; 13,757 participants). Four studies found an increased risk of endometrial cancer in subfertile women who required clomiphene citrate compared to a general population control group (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.48; four studies, 19,614 participants; very low quality evidence). These data do not tell us whether the association is due to the underlying conditions requiring clomiphene or the treatment itself.Using unexposed subfertile women as controls, exposure to gonadotropins was associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.34; four studies; 17,769 participants; very low quality evidence). The respective analysis of two studies (1595 participants) versus the general population found no difference in risk (RR 2.12, 95% CI 0.79 to 5.64: very low quality evidence).Exposure to a combination of clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins, compared to unexposed subfertile women, produced no difference in risk of endometrial cancer (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.44; two studies; 6345 participants; very low quality evidence). However, when compared to the general population, an increased risk was found , suggesting that the key factor might be subfertility, rather than treatment (RR 2.99, 95% CI 1.53 to 5.86; three studies; 7789 participants; very low quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The synthesis of the currently available evidence does not allow us to draw robust conclusions, due to the very low quality of evidence. It seems that exposure to clomiphene citrate as an ovary-stimulating drug in subfertile women is associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer, especially at doses greater than 2000 mg and high (more than 7) number of cycles. This may largely be due to underlying risk factors in women who need treatment with clomiphene citrate, such as polycystic ovary syndrome, rather than exposure to the drug itself. The evidence regarding exposure to gonadotropins was inconclusive.
机译:背景:不育症的医学治疗主要涉及使用卵巢刺激剂,包括选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERM),例如克罗米芬柠檬酸盐,促性腺激素,促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂和拮抗剂,以及人绒毛膜促性腺激素。刺激卵巢的药物可直接或间接作用于子宫内膜(子宫内膜)。无脂血症和某些不孕原因是子宫内膜癌的危险因素。目的:评估使用卵巢刺激药物治疗不育症与子宫内膜癌风险之间的关系。搜索方法:截至2016年7月,使用预先定义的搜索算法在CENTRAL,MEDLINE(Ovid)和Embase(Ovid)数据库中进行搜索。还对OpenGrey,ProQuest,ClinicalTrials.gov,ZETOC和主要会议的报告进行了搜索。我们没有强加语言和出版物状态限制。选择标准:队列研究和病例对照研究报告了成年女性子宫内膜癌与暴露于卵巢刺激性药物导致不育的关系。数据收集和分析:研究特征和发现是由成对撰写的评论作者独立提取的。通过估计I(2)量化研究之间的不一致。随机效应(RE)模型用于计算合并效应估计。进行了单独的分析,将接受治疗的生育力低下的妇女与普通人群和/或未暴露的生育力低下的妇女进行了比较,以解决将生育力低下叠加为子宫内膜癌的独立危险因素。主要结果:19项研究符合纳入条件(1,937,880名参与者)。总体而言,由于存在严重的偏见和间接风险(非随机研究(NRS),证据质量很低),这在GRADE评估中得到了反映。六项合格的研究(包括生育妇女)没有一般的人群对照组,发现暴露于任何刺激卵巢的药物与子宫内膜癌的风险增加无关(RR 0.96,95%CI 0.67至1.37; 156,774名参与者;质量非常低的证据);十五项符合条件的研究,以一般人群作为对照研究组发现暴露于任何刺激卵巢的药物后风险增加(RR 1.75,95%CI 1.18至2.61; 1,762,829名参与者;极低质量的证据)。五项合格研究,仅限于不育女性(92,849名参与者)报道柠檬酸克罗米芬;汇总研究表明呈正相关(RR 1.32; 95%CI 1.01至1.71; 88,618名参与者;非常低质量的证据),尽管仅在高剂量时使用(RR 1.69,95%CI 1.07至2.68;两项dies 12,073名参与者)且循环次数很高(RR 1.69,95%CI 1.16至2.47;三项研究; 13,757名参与者)。四项研究发现,与普通人群对照组相比,需要柠檬酸克罗米芬的不育女性子宫内膜癌的风险增加(RR 1.87,95%CI 1.00至3.48;四项研究,19,614名参与者;非常低的质量证据)。这些数据没有告诉我们这种关联是否是由于需要克罗米芬的潜在疾病或治疗本身引起的。使用未暴露的不育妇女作为对照,接触促性腺激素会增加子宫内膜癌的风险(RR 1.55,95%CI 1.03 to 2.34;四项研究; 17,769名参与者;非常低质量的证据)。两项研究(1595名参与者)与普通人群的相关分析发现,风险没有差异(RR 2.12,95%CI 0.79至5.64:质量证据非常低)。与未暴露的亚生育力相比,暴露于柠檬酸克罗米酚和促性腺激素的组合。女性,子宫内膜癌的风险没有差异(RR 1.18,95%CI 0.57至2.44;两项研究; 6345名参与者;非常低质量的证据)。但是,与普通人群相比,发现患病风险增加,表明关键因素可能是生育力不足,而不是治疗(RR 2.99,95%CI 1.53至5.86;三项研究; 7789名参与者;非常低的质量证据)。作者的结论:由于证据质量很低,因此现有证据的综合尚不能得出可靠的结论。似乎在不育妇女中暴露于柠檬酸克罗米芬作为刺激卵巢的药物与子宫内膜癌的风险增加有关,特别是在剂量大于2000 mg且周期数高(大于7)的情况下。这可能主要是由于需要使用柠檬酸克罗米芬治疗的女性的潜在危险因素,例如多囊卵巢综合征,而不是暴露于药物本身。关于接触促性腺激素的证据尚无定论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号